Vali – Part 2 - திருத்த வரலாறு

08:38, 6 பெப்ரவரி 2010 இல் Hariki

2010-02-06T08:38:07Z

13:04, 4 பெப்ரவரி 2010 இல் Hariki

2010-02-04T13:04:23Z

12:36, 4 பெப்ரவரி 2010 இல் Dev

2010-02-04T12:36:41Z

மாற்றங்களைக் காட்டு

Dev: "Vali – Part 2" காக்கப்பட்டது ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

2010-02-04T12:35:49Z

"Vali – Part 2" காக்கப்பட்டது ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

Dev: புதிய பக்கம்: = The sal tree proposal = Habits die hard. You are not able to trust your God when he promises to stand by your side. You are not able to believe that he is prep…

2010-02-04T12:35:02Z

புதிய பக்கம்: = The sal tree proposal = Habits die hard. You are not able to trust your God when he promises to stand by your side. You are not able to believe that he is prep…

மாற்றங்களைக் காட்டு

@@ வரிசை 205: / வரிசை 205: @@
 The poetry of Kamban just races ahead. One can actually feel the heat rising from Vali’s disappointed heart if one reads the verses aloud. Let the plaintiff speak for himself now.
-= When ‘My Lord’ becomes the accused =
+= When ‘My Lord’ becomes the accused  =
 ‘How can you do such a thing to me!’ Vali started his arguments, his skills of reasoning, logic and erudition touching a new high in his final peroration. ‘You come of a high lineage. You are highly educated. You have the right to govern all the three worlds. You are supposed to protect all the worlds. How can you go astray like this!
@@ வரிசை 217: / வரிசை 217: @@
 This argument is a bit elaborate in Valmiki Ramayana. Vali speaks of his prowess. “I would have brought (back) your wife (the princess of Mithila) to you in a single day, had you but moved me in this behalf before; for it is for this that I have been killed by you, keen as you were to oblige Sugriva. Nay, tying round the neck the evil-minded ogre, Ravana, who stole away your wife, I would have handed him over to you without his being killed in battle. I could have brought back at your command the princess of Mithila even if she had been kept in a place surrounded by sea water…” (Valmiki Ramayana, Kishkindha Kanda, Canto 17, Sloka 48-51)
 What we have presented above, with the exception of the first paragraph and the last one, are the original contributions of Kamban, which are not found in Valmiki. If one carefully observes, he has not included a few of the points argued in Valmiki. He, however, has included an important point about Sugriva’s condition.
 = When ‘My Lord’ becomes the accused…II  =
@@ வரிசை 253: / வரிசை 253: @@
 <br>
 Hari Krishnan<br><br>

@@ வரிசை 205: / வரிசை 205: @@
 The poetry of Kamban just races ahead. One can actually feel the heat rising from Vali’s disappointed heart if one reads the verses aloud. Let the plaintiff speak for himself now.
-= When ‘My Lord’ becomes the accuse  =
+= When ‘My Lord’ becomes the accused =
 ‘How can you do such a thing to me!’ Vali started his arguments, his skills of reasoning, logic and erudition touching a new high in his final peroration. ‘You come of a high lineage. You are highly educated. You have the right to govern all the three worlds. You are supposed to protect all the worlds. How can you go astray like this!
@@ வரிசை 217: / வரிசை 217: @@
 This argument is a bit elaborate in Valmiki Ramayana. Vali speaks of his prowess. “I would have brought (back) your wife (the princess of Mithila) to you in a single day, had you but moved me in this behalf before; for it is for this that I have been killed by you, keen as you were to oblige Sugriva. Nay, tying round the neck the evil-minded ogre, Ravana, who stole away your wife, I would have handed him over to you without his being killed in battle. I could have brought back at your command the princess of Mithila even if she had been kept in a place surrounded by sea water…” (Valmiki Ramayana, Kishkindha Kanda, Canto 17, Sloka 48-51)
 What we have presented above, with the exception of the first paragraph and the last one, are the original contributions of Kamban, which are not found in Valmiki. If one carefully observes, he has not included a few of the points argued in Valmiki. He, however, has included an important point about Sugriva’s condition.
 = When ‘My Lord’ becomes the accused…II  =